About Us · Contact Us · Newsroom · Sitemap · Font Size  
space
Decrease Text Size Increase Text Size top corner
NCOA Logo  
spaceImproving the lives of older Americans
Asian Couple
Yellow Line
      Advocacy · Publications · Programs · Research · Join Us · Members · Support Us  
space
Healthy Aging space Staying Independent space Work & Volunteering space Benefits for Seniors
 
Staying Independent
space
  Find Programs
space
space
  Reverse Mortgage Counseling
space
space
  Meet Groups
space
  NCCO
space
space
> National Institute of Senior Centers (NISC)
space
  About NISC
  Accreditation
  NISC Leaders
  NISC Members' Area
  NISC Membership Benefits
  NISC Resources
  Prescription for Better Health
space
space
  NISH
space
space
space
  Share/Forum
space
space
  For Seniors
space
space
 
NCOA News
space
Aging News
space
Events
space
Sign up with NCOA
 
 
 
Printer Friendly | Email this Page
National Institute of Senior Centers (NISC)
 
'Senior Center' Research: Is the phrase an oxymoron?
December 15, 2008

Is research relevant to senior centers?  Does the senior center field value research?  Can senior centers draw any benefits from research?  Can senior centers apply research to their program and service delivery models?

The answer to all those questions is a resounding "YES"!

We know that the population of Americans aged 65 and over is rapidly expanding.  Currently there are 33.9 million people (12.8% of the US population) aged 65 and over living in the US and are expected to grow to 70 million by 2030 (AARP, 2002).  The National Institute of Senior Centers (2005) reports that there are currently 16,000 senior centers serving older adults in the US.  In 1986, the National Center for Health Statistics estimated that 15% of all Americans aged 65 and over (roughly 4 million individuals) had attended a senior center in the past year.  While there is no reliable data available currently, over 10 years ago, Krout (1998) estimated that nearly 10 million senior citizens utilize a senior center program or service annually. 

Despite these rosy statistics, many senior center directors report an alarming drop in attendance rates among seniors.  Other senior center directors complain about the lack of participation by "Boomers".  While some senior centers that have diversified programming and/or modernized facilities report an increase in participation, most senior centers report otherwise.  The issue is further complicated by the decreasing public support for senior centers from federal, state, and municipal sources of funding.  The dilemma we face is a Catch-22 situation - how do we attract greater numbers of older adults without modernizing and how do we modernize without adequate fiscal support?

The issue is further complicated by the fact that older adults today have greater choices and options for recreation, socialization and aging-related services than ever before.  If senior centers are to compete for greater attention and patronage in this new environment, we need to establish conclusively who we are and what we do. 

Some of the questions we need to ask ourselves are:
What impact do we have on the seniors who do participate in our programs? 
How do we influence and enrich the communities we serve?
How do we know that the programs or services we offer are effective?
How do we know that we are meeting the evolving needs of our target population?
What do senior center participants look like nationally?
How does the larger world perceive us and our role within the realm of aging services?


In order to answer these questions, we need reliable data and information.  This data can only be provided through rigorous research and scientific exploration.  The world of not-for-profit services has already latched onto the importance of outcome evaluation - that is, not to focus on what we offer, rather, what is the specific impact of what we offer on our consumers?  Funding in the not-for-profit world is now intrinsically linked to the ability of agencies and organizations to demonstrate the impact of their services on the consumers of those services.  The organization that makes the biggest impact in a community or generates the most excitement is generally the one that gets funded.  Therefore, it is imperative for us professionals in the senior center field to keep abreast of what is going on in the world of research on aging and aging-related services.

NISC has created a bibliography (resource guide) of the most significant research studies conducted in or about senior centers in the last 20 years (the resource guide can be accessed here (pdf)  Just a cursory review of the guide yields some interesting and valuable topics:

  1. Designing and offering evidence-based programs in a senior center.
  2. Integrating the young-elderly and the frail elderly in senior centers.
  3. The recreational and socialization patterns of older men.
  4. Marketing a new senior center to a community
  5. Collaborating with universities on research projects related to senior centers.
  6. Impact of senior center participation on the mental health, cognitive skills, depression and social support among older adults.
  7. Innovations in recreational programming to attract new participants.


 
The examples of studies listed above and many others can be extremely valuable to senior center professionals.  You can utilize this research to:

  • Create new programming for your senior center.
  • Develop new and innovative marketing plans to attract new participants (including "Boomers").
  • Learn about the likes, dislikes, spending patterns and changing needs of older adults.
  • Establish beneficial partnerships with universities, community organizations and foundations.
  • Write effective grant applications. (If you want to attract funders, you first have to establish the need and rationale for the program; and second, you have to demonstrate that your program will have a specific impact on the recipient.  Therefore, you need documented research to establish the importance of senior centers and strengthen your appeal to funders - individuals and foundations.)


As a former senior center director and a current researcher, I am passionate about the continued relevance of senior centers.  NISC is committed to demonstrating the impact that our field has on the lives of older adults, as well as the community-at-large.  But for us to be considered relevant and significant in the new millennium, we have to adopt the idea of evidence-based service models and cutting-edge aging research as an integral component of our planning efforts.  Reading, assessing and incorporating research into our daily operations is essential and critical to our continued growth and enrichment. 

So please……………give it a try, won't ya?



<< Return to National Institute of Senior Centers (NISC) Main